In depth: We challenged Samsung and BlackBerry over their Android security claims


We challenged Samsung and BlackBerry

BlackBerry claims to have “the world’s most secure Android smartphone” in the DTEK50. The slogan is splashed across its website and can be seen on advertising hoardings in major cities – it really has gone all-out.

There is a problem though. BlackBerry isn’t the only one making the claim.

Whether it’s for business, personal or private reasons, some people just need to know they have the most secure phone that money can buy – but in 2016 that’s proving quite difficult.

DTEK 50

Samsung’s recently launched Galaxy Note 7, BlackBerry’s new DTEK50 and plucky up-start Sirin’s Solarin phone all make the claim to be the most secure Android phone you can buy.

Security is not a new selling point for mobile phones, but this is the first time three companies have each claimed to have the most secure Android device on the market, making it very confusing for those looking for the highest security phone.

Conor Pierce, Vice President of IT and Mobile at Samsung UK told TechRadar, “Iris scanning delivers a hundred times more secure security than a fingerprint and a more reliable security solution on your device.

“That coupled with the Knox solution, it [the Galaxy Note 7] is the most secure device you can have.”

Galaxy Note 7

When asked if the Galaxy Note 7 is more secure than the BlackBerry DTEK50, Pierce confirmed Samsung believes it is. He cited the combination of its Knox security software and iris scanning tech as offering military grade security.

Controversial claims

But BlackBerry has marketed the DTEK50 as the most secure Android phone you can buy right – even its YouTube ad opens with the words “Introducing the world’s most secure Android smartphone”.

When TechRadar put Samsung’s claims to BlackBerry, the Canadian firm stood by its title.

A BlackBerry spokesperson told TechRadar, “The DTEK50 has many security advantages over Knox, including rapid patching, the DTEK application, and platform hardening features such as zygote ASLR.

“Security is about protecting the weakest link and no single feature can instantly make a platform secure.

“Claiming that anything is ‘100 times more secure’ is very bold and we look forward to seeing the technical documentation and independent third-party verification of this claim.”

Iris scanning is also under scrutiny by some security experts on whether it poses more issues than it solves.

Charles Read, UK Regional Director at OneLogin, told The Mirror, “Biometrics may be more convenient for consumers but as the legal and privacy implications evolve, the related security risks with using this form of access need to be considered.”

Galaxy Note 7

“It turns out this new wave of biometric techniques put consumers in a new kind of risk as [while] they can easily mitigate passwords hacks by simply changing passwords, the hack of a fingerprint or iris scan however can lead to a lifetime of problems for consumers.”

These issues don’t just refer to iris scanners – it could also pose issues for fingerprint sensors, which are available on most high-end smartphones.

A Samsung spokesperson told TechRadar, “The Galaxy Note 7 provides best-in-class security features with biometric authentication to keep users’ personal data safe.

“In addition to fingerprint scanning capabilities, the Galaxy Note 7 features new iris scanning technology coupled with our trusted, defence-grade Knox security platform, which recently received the most “strong” ratings of any mobile security platform in Gartner’s ‘Mobile Device Security: A Comparison of Platforms’ study.”

That study analysed twelve different mobile device operating systems including Android 6 Marshmallow, which both the Galaxy Note 7 and BlackBerry DTEK 50 run.

Knox was analysed as a separate enterprise management tool with the results included in the test – but this all took place before DTEK’s security option for BlackBerry launched.

Three horse race

It’s not just Samsung and BlackBerry fighting it out though, there’s a third horse in this race in newbie Sirin and its Solarin phone.

You may have read about it as the phone costing almost £10,000 and its extravagant star-studded launch party attended by Tom Hardy, Josh Brolin and Leonardo Di Caprio.

Solarin offers a unique security service that BlackBerry and Samsung do not, but you’ll need to pay for it.

A spokesperson for Solarin told TechRadar its “unique solution provides two levels of security in order to meet the needs of our customers, as security features are only effective if deployed and not cumbersome to the user.”

“Solarin is protected by Zimperium state-of-the-art threat protection, maintained by behaviour-based analytics.

Solarin

“We consider these to be the most effective method of real-time defense, as they work by identifying unusual behavior and taking real-time action to guard your private information, as opposed to tolerating the delay necessary for a security breach to be identified, logged, recognized and subsequent response deployed.”

BlackBerry and Samsung don’t offer this type of security on either the Galaxy Note 7 or the DTEK 50.

The spokesperson continued, “Solarin’s unique secure zone is facilitate by chip-to-chip encryption, physically ring-fencing your private communications and affording the most secure solutions outside of the military.

“These communications are conveyed by 256-bit AES encryption, the same technology that militaries around the world use to protect their communications.”

Encryption is an option available on both the BlackBerry DTEK 50 and the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 through the Knox application.

The DTEK 50 has your data encrypted to start with, but then a feature within the DTEK app allows you to set up “secure start-up” which uses your phone screen to strengthen the encryption.

DTEK50

It’s difficult to say which manufacturer has the most secure Android phone then, with no one willing to back down.

Unless you’re disgustingly wealthy, the real showdown here is between Samsung and BlackBerry and if you’re that concerned with smartphone security both sides offer compelling privacy options.

Can’t pick a side? Then let us help.

Source: techradar.com

#Amazon #Android #Apple #Asus #camera #Galaxy #Google #Games #iPad #iPhone #Lenovo #Lumia #Laptop #Microsoft #Moto #Motorola #news #Nexus #Note #OnePlus #phone #Plus #Releases #review #Samsung #smartphone #Sony #Watch #Windows #Xiaomi #Xperia



Top Brands

25 Comments
  1. Reply Arnaldo Blick August 19, 2016 at 9:53 pm

    I'm guilty of that, like a lot of people, but Linux is a great platform for both servers and end users, like on Android. So I don't really understand the hatred towards it, besides the fact that these people use outdated information on what Linux was, and not what it's become.

  2. Reply Katheryn Waters August 19, 2016 at 10:22 pm

    I would agree here, Samsung is known to be the worst to release security updates and system updates as google releases them. A little while ago samsung took 90 days to release one of googles monthly updates. Blackberry released it day 0. And on the subject of monthly security patches, i wonder where nexus phone fall compared to blackberry and samsung.

  3. Reply Prof. Tiara Anderson I August 19, 2016 at 10:59 pm

    Exactly. :)

  4. Reply Blake Bradtke August 19, 2016 at 11:22 pm

    Samsung partnered with BlackBerry In order to fix their knox security.
    Knox is BlackBerry security. Albeit watered down a little.

    Who cares anyway. It's BlackBerry's productivity features that appeal to me. It's the superior communication device. Samsung flagships are superior for gaming.

  5. Reply Abigayle Jenkins August 20, 2016 at 6:35 am

    Interesting. Thanks for clearing that up. Yes they are, and that, with my preference of physical keyboards is why I'll stick with BlackBerry.

  6. Reply Dane Morissette August 20, 2016 at 6:55 am

    It is. It is supposed to be run on BES12 servers.
    Blackberry is the security winner.

  7. Reply Mr. Kaley Dickinson August 20, 2016 at 7:34 am

    didn't Samsung announced the Note 7 after BB announced that patch?
    so there is a chance that Note 7 is patched before they sell it.
    But since BB announced zero day patch and Samsung didn't (at least AFAIK) then BB have an advantage on that.

  8. Reply Roxane Bartell August 20, 2016 at 7:45 am

    That's true. But if I can save $150 on a Windows license, I'm going to!

  9. Reply Jo Emmerich IV August 20, 2016 at 7:53 am

    This guy goes around to different sites posting the same exact thing over and over again.

  10. Reply Dr. Monroe Corwin August 20, 2016 at 8:36 am

    Blackberry can't be rooted.
    The winner is clear. Blackberry's DTEK50 and PRIV are the most secure Android devices on the market. And when you consider that the DTEK50 is less than half the price of the S7, the winner is even more clear.

  11. Reply Olen Abernathy August 20, 2016 at 12:45 pm

    BlackBerry was contracted by Samsung to fix Knox. BlackBerry phones can't be rooted and don't actually require BES 12 to maintain security. Couple this with 0 day patches and you have the most secure Android device. It isn't a comparison.

  12. Reply Alec Jenkins August 20, 2016 at 1:36 pm

    Exactly. BlackBerry wins by default.

  13. Reply Dominique Larkin August 20, 2016 at 4:23 pm

    That is fine with me. I don't have the same excitement for Linux right now but have no problem if it sometime becomes the standard. All of my relatives want to use Office. I almost had a revolt when I tried to make my wife and kids use OpenOffice. That certainly wouldn't fly in our business environment. Maybe one day but today it just isn't realistic.

  14. Reply Hannah Kihn August 20, 2016 at 6:19 pm

    I was being fececious. I get Linux I really do but there is a reason it only has 2% usage rate on desktops. Yes part of that is because the big guys have billions of dollars behind them but also linux is just not practical for most desktop users. There are options and they are all good for different reasons. I just get sick of people complaining about Windows or Mac just because they like Linux.

  15. Reply Russel Shanahan August 20, 2016 at 9:44 pm

    Interesting. So basically the answer is we don't know. The only way to find out is to hire a team of professional hackers to try to crack both phones. Given the modifications BlackBerry made to strengthen Android's security are not open source, it's not trivial to test their claim. However, as others have mentioned, not being rootable is a big plus.

  16. Reply Mr. Marcus Weber V August 20, 2016 at 10:58 pm

    I find it interesting that Samsung keeps mentioning Knox, while BlackBerry doesn't require BES12 to make the same security claim.

    Advantage BlackBerry

  17. Reply Mr. Imani Wehner DDS August 20, 2016 at 11:05 pm

    Why don't BlackBerry and Samsung let professional hackers do an independent security study. Hands on and remotely. Only they can provide an insight on the security of the phone. And let Iphone join too

  18. Reply Lemuel Kozey August 20, 2016 at 11:24 pm

    Would you please give an example for Iris scanner being compiled ,in case you forget the article, no problem.

  19. Reply Jewell Conn August 21, 2016 at 2:23 am

    Wait Wait Wait. I thought Android used Linux? If it uses Linux all the fanboys claim Linux is the most secure unbreakable OS in the world. The best OS ever.

  20. Reply Jarvis Crooks August 21, 2016 at 2:29 am

    Linux is NOT unbreakable, there are benefits to using open source software. One of them being faster and better security, by design. There are always going to be bugs and issues with the design of any OS or piece of software, which is why we have updates. Linux is no exception. What Linux does better than Windows or other closed source Operating Systems is that a fix is generally out as quickly as possible, unlike a company like Microsoft having to first admit there's even a problem at all (they don't usually, like with the latest thing about Windows 10's anniversary update borking webcams) then they have to deem it worth fixing, and then they update during a monthly patch that may or may not include the fix at all, because they're "cumulative" updates that for all we know coud contain as much as commented code saying "fixed, I think lol"

  21. Reply Jacinthe Conroy V August 21, 2016 at 3:32 am

    I don't like Windows and Mac OS because they're closed source, and I like Linux because Linux Mint has become a very usable OS. I even am switching my technology challenge parents onto it slowly, and it seems to be working.

  22. Reply Prof. Rossie Rath August 21, 2016 at 3:55 am

    That sounds like a extra special BBM-like service to me…

  23. Reply Travis Pagac August 21, 2016 at 4:22 am

    Blackberry should get the respect it deserves. It's the only company that gave a crap about security since day one.

  24. Reply Mr. Brando Moore III August 21, 2016 at 5:19 am

    Independent pro hackers do not need anyone's approval to conduct security studies…
    But such an entity rarely publishes when they failed at hacking a device (like the BlackBerry Priv that was released ten months ago).

  25. Reply Jayne Kling August 21, 2016 at 7:50 am

    Did BlackBerry not help Samsung with Knox?

    WIN BLACKBERRY

Leave a reply